AI Act Compliance for Municipalities
Welfare algorithms, fraud detection, care assessment — how does your municipality comply with the AI Act?
Practical guidance for municipal AI systems: from filling in the Algorithm Register to conducting an IAMA.
Specifically developed for municipal practice
Important Deadlines for Municipalities
Prohibited AI Practices
Social scoring and manipulative AI systems are prohibited. Check your systems.
High-Risk Obligations
Welfare algorithms and fraud detection must meet strict requirements.
Algorithm Register
AP urges registration of high-risk systems in the Algorithm Register.
High-Risk AI in Municipalities
These municipal AI systems likely fall under the AI Act high-risk category
Welfare Algorithms
Automated assessment of benefit applications or re-evaluations
Fraud Detection
Risk profiling and detection of improper use
Youth Care Signaling
Early warning of risks in families
Care Assessment
Automated support for care indications
Get Started Now
Concrete steps for your municipality
Lessons from Practice
What other municipalities experienced
The Rotterdam Affair
How a fraud detection algorithm led to discrimination and what we can learn from it.
Lesson:
Risk profiling requires careful discrimination testing
SyRI and the Lawsuit
The System Risk Indication was banned by the court for human rights violations.
Lesson:
Transparency and proportionality are legally enforceable
Algorithm Register Pioneers
Municipalities like Amsterdam and Utrecht led the way with transparent algorithm registration.
Lesson:
Proactive transparency builds trust
Templates for Municipalities
Directly applicable in your organization
IAMA Quick Scan
FreeQuickly determine if an IAMA is needed for your municipal AI system
Risk Classification Decision Tree
FreeVisual flowchart specifically for municipal AI applications
Algorithm Register Template
Template with example texts for municipal systems
Executive AI Policy Proposal
Ready-made board proposal for municipal council