Annex III expert page
For law enforcement, analysis must start with authority, necessity, proportionality and rights impact.
Use this page as a classification overview and route into legal-governance review.
Annex III point 6
Law enforcement is a sensitive Annex III area. Assessment must start with authority, necessity, proportionality and impact on fundamental rights.
Is AI used in a context where criminal assessment, profiling or evidence evaluation can directly affect people?
AI assessing the risk of a natural person becoming the victim of a criminal offence.
AI for polygraphs or similar tools, and AI evaluating the reliability of evidence.
AI assessing concrete persons for offending/reoffending or profiling in detection, investigation or prosecution.
Short answers for classification, evidence and next steps under Annex III.
Expert review is useful when the core question is not straightforward: Is AI used in a context where criminal assessment, profiling or evidence evaluation can directly affect people? This is especially relevant when the outcome may affect access, assessment, safety, oversight or fundamental rights.
A classification intake maps the intended purpose, Annex III route, Article 6(3) filter, profiling, provider/deployer roles and the first evidence items.
This page provides general explanation based on the AI Act and the Commission guidelines. Concrete classification depends on system design, use context, role allocation and available documentation.
Use this page as a classification overview and route into legal-governance review.