DPIA vs FRIA
Which impact assessment do you need for AI?
DPIA under GDPR, FRIA under the AI Act - two different but related assessments. Discover when you need which, what the key differences are, and how to combine them.
Why Two Different Impact Assessments?
GDPR and AI Act complement each other
In 2016, GDPR introduced the Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for privacy risks. With the EU AI Regulation (August 2024), the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) was added, specifically for high-risk AI systems. This dual obligation arises because AI systems can pose broader risks than data protection alone. While a DPIA focuses on privacy-related risks, a FRIA looks at the full spectrum of fundamental rights: human dignity, non-discrimination, freedom of expression, access to justice and more.
DPIA
Privacy & data protection
FRIA
All fundamental rights
AI-specific
FRIA for high-risk AI
Complementary
Can be combined
DPIA: Data Protection Central
Article 35 GDPR - When and how
Under Article 35 of GDPR, you must perform a DPIA when processing "is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons." This applies when you: systematically and extensively evaluate personal aspects of people, do this based on automated processing including profiling, and base decisions on this that affect people. A DPIA must be performed before the start of processing activities - during the planning phase, not afterwards.
Timing
Before processing starts
Focus
Personal data
Reporting
Internal (normally)
Responsible
Data controller
FRIA: Broader Fundamental Rights Focus
Article 27 AI Regulation - For high-risk AI
The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is established in Article 27 of the EU AI Regulation. Unlike the DPIA, the FRIA takes a human-centered approach by examining all relevant fundamental rights: human dignity, equality before the law, non-discrimination, cultural diversity, and the right to effective remedy. The FRIA is mandatory for: (1) all public bodies and private entities providing services of public interest (education, healthcare, social services), and (2) all organizations using AI for creditworthiness assessments or insurance risk assessment.
Public bodies
Always FRIA mandatory
Financial sector
Credit & insurance
Reporting
Mandatory to regulator
Deadline
From August 2026
The 5 Key Differences
DPIA vs FRIA comparison table
1. FOCUS: DPIA focuses on data protection and privacy, FRIA on all fundamental rights. 2. DATA TYPE: DPIA only personal data, FRIA also non-personal data. 3. SCOPE: DPIA for all high-risk data processing, FRIA specifically for high-risk AI systems. 4. WHO IS OBLIGATED: DPIA for data controllers, FRIA for certain categories of AI users (deployers). 5. REPORTING: DPIA internal (except for prior consultation), FRIA mandatory notification to supervisor.
Focus
Privacy vs all rights
Data
Personal data vs all data
Who
Controller vs deployer
Reporting
Internal vs external mandatory
Can DPIA and FRIA be Combined?
Article 27(4) AI Regulation acknowledges the overlap
Yes! The AI Regulation acknowledges the overlap between both assessments. Article 27(4) states that a FRIA can complement an existing DPIA when both are required. You can choose: (1) Two separate assessments - separate DPIA and FRIA documents, or (2) Integrated assessment - one combined document that meets both sets of requirements. For successful integration, the document must cover all DPIA requirements from Article 35 GDPR, contain all FRIA elements from Article 27 AI Regulation, and address the broader scope of fundamental rights. Practical tip: Start with your existing DPIA template and extend it with FRIA elements.
Yes, possible
Article 27(4) AI Regulation
Option 1
Two separate documents
Option 2
One integrated document
Tip
Extend DPIA template
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the most common questions about the EU AI Act
Ready to get started?
Discover how we can help your organization with EU AI Act compliance.