Responsible AI Platform
Article 22 of 11319%

Article 22: Authorised representatives of providers of high-risk AI systems

EU Official:
Title III: High-Risk AI Systems

Official text

||

Source: EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — text reproduced verbatim.

📥 Download AI Act (PDF)

⚖️ Related Enforcement

No enforcement actions for this article yet. Follow developments via the Enforcement Tracker.

Related articles

Frequently asked questions

What is an authorised representative under Article 22 AI Act?
Article 22 requires providers established outside the EU to appoint an authorised representative in the EU by written mandate, before placing their high-risk AI systems on the EU market.
What tasks does the authorised representative have under Article 22?
The authorised representative must keep the declaration of conformity and technical documentation available to authorities, cooperate with competent authorities, and inform the provider of requests.
Do SMEs also need to comply with Article 22 of the AI Act?
Article 22 of the AI Act does not provide a general exemption for SMEs. However, the AI Act includes supportive measures and potentially lighter obligations for small and medium-sized enterprises, depending on their role in the AI value chain.
How does Article 22 of the AI Act relate to the GDPR?
Article 22 of the AI Act complements the GDPR. While the GDPR protects personal data, the AI Act focuses on the safety and trustworthiness of AI systems. Organisations must comply with both regulations when their AI system processes personal data.
What are the deadlines for Article 22 of the AI Act?
The AI Act follows a phased implementation. Prohibited AI practices apply from February 2025, obligations for high-risk AI systems from August 2026, and other provisions take effect gradually. The specific deadline for Article 22 depends on the category of the obligation.
Does Article 22 of the AI Act also apply to AI systems I purchase?
Yes, Article 22 of the AI Act may also be relevant when you purchase AI systems. As a deployer, you have your own obligations under the AI Act, regardless of whether you developed the system yourself or purchased it from a provider.
What is the difference between provider and deployer under Article 22 of the AI Act?
Under Article 22 of the AI Act, the provider is the entity that develops or places the AI system on the market, while the deployer is the entity that uses the system under its own authority. Both roles carry different obligations.
What documentation does Article 22 of the AI Act require?
Article 22 of the AI Act requires that relevant documentation is maintained as part of the compliance process. This may include technical documentation, instructions for use, logs or declarations of conformity, depending on the classification of the AI system.

📬 AI Act Weekly

Get the most important AI Act developments in your inbox every week.

Subscribe